Abstract
This commentary analyzes different past approaches to scientific evaluation frameworks given algorithmic superintelligence claims and discusses guidelines for more rigorous solutions avoiding overhasty and damaging epistemic self-sabotage tendencies. Effects of spreading the misconceived idea of the epistemic perpetuum mobile are elucidated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | PhilPapers |
| Publication status | Unpublished - 2024 |