TY - JOUR
T1 - Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C
AU - Rogelj, Joeri
AU - Popp, Alexander
AU - CALVIN, KATHERINE V.
AU - Luderer, Gunnar
AU - Emmerling, Johannes
AU - Gernaat, David
AU - Fujimori, Shinichiro
AU - Strefler, Jessica
AU - Hasegawa, Tomoko
AU - Marangoni, Giacomo
AU - Krey, Volker
AU - Kriegler, Elmar
AU - Riahi, Keywan
AU - van Vuuren, Detlef P.
AU - Doelman, Jonathan
AU - Drouet, Laurent
AU - Edmonds, Jae
AU - Fricko, Oliver
AU - Harmsen, Mathijs
AU - Havlík, Petr
AU - Humpenöder, Florian
AU - Stehfest, Elke
AU - Tavoni, Massimo
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for countries to pursue efforts to limit global-mean temperature rise to 1.5 °C. The transition pathways that can meet such a target have not, however, been extensively explored. Here we describe scenarios that limit end-of-century radiative forcing to 1.9 W m−2, and consequently restrict median warming in the year 2100 to below 1.5 °C. We use six integrated assessment models and a simple climate model, under different socio-economic, technological and resource assumptions from five Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs). Some, but not all, SSPs are amenable to pathways to 1.5 °C. Successful 1.9 W m−2 scenarios are characterized by a rapid shift away from traditional fossil-fuel use towards large-scale low-carbon energy supplies, reduced energy use, and carbon-dioxide removal. However, 1.9 W m−2 scenarios could not be achieved in several models under SSPs with strong inequalities, high baseline fossil-fuel use, or scattered short-term climate policy. Further research can help policy-makers to understand the real-world implications of these scenarios.
AB - The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for countries to pursue efforts to limit global-mean temperature rise to 1.5 °C. The transition pathways that can meet such a target have not, however, been extensively explored. Here we describe scenarios that limit end-of-century radiative forcing to 1.9 W m−2, and consequently restrict median warming in the year 2100 to below 1.5 °C. We use six integrated assessment models and a simple climate model, under different socio-economic, technological and resource assumptions from five Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs). Some, but not all, SSPs are amenable to pathways to 1.5 °C. Successful 1.9 W m−2 scenarios are characterized by a rapid shift away from traditional fossil-fuel use towards large-scale low-carbon energy supplies, reduced energy use, and carbon-dioxide removal. However, 1.9 W m−2 scenarios could not be achieved in several models under SSPs with strong inequalities, high baseline fossil-fuel use, or scattered short-term climate policy. Further research can help policy-makers to understand the real-world implications of these scenarios.
KW - Climate-change mitigation
KW - Energy and society
KW - Energy modelling
KW - Socioeconomic scenarios
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85042870561
U2 - 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3
DO - 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042870561
SN - 1758-678X
VL - 8
SP - 325
EP - 332
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
ER -