Safety requirements vs. crashing ethically: what matters most for policies on autonomous vehicles

  • Björn Lundgren

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The philosophical–ethical literature and the public debate on autonomous vehicles have been obsessed with ethical issues related to crashing. In this article, these discussions, including more empirical investigations, will be critically assessed. It is argued that a related and more pressing issue is questions concerning safety. For example, what should we require from autonomous vehicles when it comes to safety? What do we mean by ‘safety’? How do we measure it? In response to these questions, the article will present a foundation for a continued discussion on these issues and an argument for why discussions about safety should be prioritized over ethical concerns related to crashing.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)405-415
    JournalAI & SOCIETY
    Volume36
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2021

    Keywords

    • Autonomous vehicles
    • Self-driving vehicles
    • Ethical crashing
    • Trolley problem
    • Safety argument
    • Vision zero

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Safety requirements vs. crashing ethically: what matters most for policies on autonomous vehicles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this