TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk sharing and the demand for insurance: Theory and experimental evidence from Ethiopia
AU - Berg, Erlend
AU - Michael, Blake
AU - Morsink, Karlijn
N1 - Funding Information:
We are indebted to Tagel Gebrehiwot Gidey for research coordination. We are grateful for useful comments from Daniel Clarke, Stefan Dercon, Glenn Harrison, Mahreen Mahmud, Costas Meghir, Kalle Moene, Ollie Ramsey, Debraj Ray, Jim Roth, Elisabeth Sadoulet and audiences at the University of Bristol, the University of Kent, the 2017 CSAE conference, 2017 SEEDEC conference, and 2017 DIAL conference. This paper is an output of Improving Institutions for Pro-Poor Growth (iiG), a research programme funded by the UK Department for International Development. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the funder. Declarations of interest: none.
Funding Information:
We are indebted to Tagel Gebrehiwot Gidey for research coordination. We are grateful for useful comments from Daniel Clarke, Stefan Dercon, Glenn Harrison, Mahreen Mahmud, Costas Meghir, Kalle Moene, Ollie Ramsey, Debraj Ray, Jim Roth, Elisabeth Sadoulet and audiences at the University of Bristol, the University of Kent, the 2017 CSAE conference, 2017 SEEDEC conference, and 2017 DIAL conference. This paper is an output of Improving Institutions for Pro-Poor Growth (iiG), a research programme funded by the UK Department for International Development. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the funder. Declarations of interest: none.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Households in developing countries commonly engage in risk sharing to cope with shocks. Despite this, the residual risk they remain exposed to — often due to aggregate events such as droughts and floods — is considerable. To mitigate these risks, governments, NGOs and multilateral organizations have introduced index insurance. To appreciate its welfare implications, however, it is necessary to assess how insurance interacts with pre-existing risk sharing. We ask to what extent the demand for index insurance — as compared to standard indemnity insurance — depends on the level of pre-existing risk sharing. We contribute by developing a simple theoretical framework which shows that, relative to a state of autarky, risk sharing between agents increases demand for index insurance and decreases demand for indemnity insurance. In an artefactual field experiment with Ethiopian farmers who share risk in real life, we test and confirm these predictions.
AB - Households in developing countries commonly engage in risk sharing to cope with shocks. Despite this, the residual risk they remain exposed to — often due to aggregate events such as droughts and floods — is considerable. To mitigate these risks, governments, NGOs and multilateral organizations have introduced index insurance. To appreciate its welfare implications, however, it is necessary to assess how insurance interacts with pre-existing risk sharing. We ask to what extent the demand for index insurance — as compared to standard indemnity insurance — depends on the level of pre-existing risk sharing. We contribute by developing a simple theoretical framework which shows that, relative to a state of autarky, risk sharing between agents increases demand for index insurance and decreases demand for indemnity insurance. In an artefactual field experiment with Ethiopian farmers who share risk in real life, we test and confirm these predictions.
KW - Artefactual field experiment
KW - Indemnity insurance
KW - Index insurance
KW - Risk sharing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123732403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.035
DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.035
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-2681
VL - 195
SP - 236
EP - 256
JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
ER -