Ribosomal scanning on the highly structured insulin-like growth factor II-leader 1

A.W. van der Velden, K. van Nierop, A.A.M. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The complex architecture of human insulin-like growth factor (IGF) II-leader 1 of 592 nucleotides (nt), with one open reading frame (ORF), and the potential to fold into stable structures makes efficient linear ribosomal scanning difficult to comprehend. Indeed, leader 1-driven reporter expression is low in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Contrarily, leader 1 is very efficient in cells. Therefore, we tested whether this 5'UTR uses an alternative mechanism for translation initiation in vivo, internal entry or ribosomal shunting. Internal initiation was tested by introducing leader 1 into the intercistronic region of a bicistronic vector. Second cistron expression, driven by leader 1, was lower than by the intercistronic beta-globin 5'UTR, indicating that leader 1 does not contain an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). Shunting was tested by inserting hairpin (HP) structures, capable of blocking ribosomal scanning, at eight positions in leader 1. After transfection, these mutant 5'UTRs were incapable of directing reporter expression. Less stable HPs at the same positions increased the activity to 50% of wild-type activity, indicating that insertions at these positions are not disastrous for initiation. These data indicate that the translational machinery encounters major parts of leader 1. As scanning seems unlikely, and internal entry and shunting were shown not to occur, we discuss a modified scanning mechanism for architecturally complex 5'UTRs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-297
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Volume34
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • Life sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ribosomal scanning on the highly structured insulin-like growth factor II-leader 1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this