TY - JOUR
T1 - Reviewing the sociotechnical dynamics of carbon removal
AU - Sovacool, Benjamin
AU - Baum, Chad
AU - Low, Sean
N1 - Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the European Research Council (ERC) grant agreement no. 951542-GENIE-ERC-2020-SyG, “GeoEngineering and NegatIve Emissions pathways in Europe” (GENIE). The content of this deliverable does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s). The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the European Research Council (ERC) grant agreement no. 951542-GENIE-ERC-2020-SyG , “GeoEngineering and NegatIve Emissions pathways in Europe” (GENIE). The content of this deliverable does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/1/18
Y1 - 2023/1/18
N2 - In recent years, carbon removal and associated net-zero energy technologies have emerged as serious options for policymakers and scientists to consider when trying to address climate change. How, where, and when to use these options effectively are, how- ever, polemic, and research examining the social or justice dimen- sions of deployment—actual or prospective—remains uncommon. This review provides an interdisciplinary and holistic perspective of the sociotechnical dynamics of carbon-removal options. It em- ploys a sociotechnical approach that reveals the different epistemic, economic, technical, social, political, and environmental elements necessary for a net-zero energy transition. In this review, we first summarize seven broad classes of carbon removal—afforestation and reforestation, soil carbon sequestration, marine biomass and blue carbon, direct air capture with carbon storage, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, enhanced weathering, and bio- char. The review then explores four critical sociotechnical areas in greater depth: modeling and assessment, social acceptance, innova- tion and scaling, and policy and governance. We conclude with im- plications for policy and research.
AB - In recent years, carbon removal and associated net-zero energy technologies have emerged as serious options for policymakers and scientists to consider when trying to address climate change. How, where, and when to use these options effectively are, how- ever, polemic, and research examining the social or justice dimen- sions of deployment—actual or prospective—remains uncommon. This review provides an interdisciplinary and holistic perspective of the sociotechnical dynamics of carbon-removal options. It em- ploys a sociotechnical approach that reveals the different epistemic, economic, technical, social, political, and environmental elements necessary for a net-zero energy transition. In this review, we first summarize seven broad classes of carbon removal—afforestation and reforestation, soil carbon sequestration, marine biomass and blue carbon, direct air capture with carbon storage, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, enhanced weathering, and bio- char. The review then explores four critical sociotechnical areas in greater depth: modeling and assessment, social acceptance, innova- tion and scaling, and policy and governance. We conclude with im- plications for policy and research.
KW - carbon dioxide removal
KW - climate engineering
KW - greenhouse gas removal
KW - negative emissions technologies
KW - net-zero transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146261399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joule.2022.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.joule.2022.11.008
M3 - Review article
SN - 2542-4351
VL - 7
SP - 57
EP - 82
JO - Joule
JF - Joule
IS - 1
ER -