Review of Stefania Centrone Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

C. Ierna

doi:10.1007/s10743-012-9120-7

Review of Stefania Centrone Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

C. Ierna

Research output: Contribution to journal › Book/Film/Article review › Academic

Abstract

Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	251-253
Number of pages	3
Journal	Husserl Studies
Volume	29
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-012-9120-7
Publication status	Published - 2013

Bibliographical note

Stefania Centrone’s book provides an in-depth analysis and interpretation of Edmund Husserl’s early work, from the publication of the Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891) to that of the Logical Investigations (1900/1901). The book consists of three long chapters, respectively discussing Husserl’s first book, the Philosophy of Arithmetic, the idea of pure logic in the Prolegomena, and the problem of the imaginary in mathematics, which was the topic of Husserl’s 1901 “Double Lecture” for the mathematical society in Göttingen. Each chapter is followed by a number of article-length appendixes that focus in great detail on a specific issue or text, such as the definition of computable functions and Husserl’s 1896 lectures on logic.

Keywords

Wijsbegeerte

Access to Document

10.1007/s10743-012-9120-7

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10743-012-9120-7

Cite this

@article{a4f0feebd53c45dd8be53517ae216451,

title = "Review of Stefania Centrone Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl",

abstract = "Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl",

keywords = "Wijsbegeerte",

author = "C. Ierna",

note = "Stefania Centrone{\textquoteright}s book provides an in-depth analysis and interpretation of Edmund Husserl{\textquoteright}s early work, from the publication of the Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891) to that of the Logical Investigations (1900/1901). The book consists of three long chapters, respectively discussing Husserl{\textquoteright}s first book, the Philosophy of Arithmetic, the idea of pure logic in the Prolegomena, and the problem of the imaginary in mathematics, which was the topic of Husserl{\textquoteright}s 1901 “Double Lecture” for the mathematical society in G{\"o}ttingen. Each chapter is followed by a number of article-length appendixes that focus in great detail on a specific issue or text, such as the definition of computable functions and Husserl{\textquoteright}s 1896 lectures on logic.",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1007/s10743-012-9120-7",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "251--253",

journal = "Husserl Studies",

issn = "0167-9848",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of Stefania Centrone Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

AU - Ierna, C.

N1 - Stefania Centrone’s book provides an in-depth analysis and interpretation of Edmund Husserl’s early work, from the publication of the Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891) to that of the Logical Investigations (1900/1901). The book consists of three long chapters, respectively discussing Husserl’s first book, the Philosophy of Arithmetic, the idea of pure logic in the Prolegomena, and the problem of the imaginary in mathematics, which was the topic of Husserl’s 1901 “Double Lecture” for the mathematical society in Göttingen. Each chapter is followed by a number of article-length appendixes that focus in great detail on a specific issue or text, such as the definition of computable functions and Husserl’s 1896 lectures on logic.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

AB - Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

KW - Wijsbegeerte

U2 - 10.1007/s10743-012-9120-7

DO - 10.1007/s10743-012-9120-7

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

SN - 0167-9848

VL - 29

SP - 251

EP - 253

JO - Husserl Studies

JF - Husserl Studies

ER -

Review of Stefania Centrone Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this