Revealing conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: an eye-tracking study: ICOTS10 (2018) Invited Paper - Refereed

L.B.M.M. Boels, Rutmer Ebbes, A. Bakker, Wim Van Dooren, P.H.M. Drijvers

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

Abstract

Many people misinterpret histograms. The conjecture is that some of these misinterpretations emerge from the application of interpretation strategies associated with case-value plots. To investigate this, eye-movement data were collected from six university students solving questions on histograms and case-value plots. Analysis of gaze data and cued retrospective verbal reports showed that participants seemed to use a histogram interpretation strategy, a case-value plot interpretation strategy or an elimination strategy. Several participants appeared to use a single preferred strategy without distinguishing between the type of graphs at stake. As conjectured, some participants applied a case-value plot strategy also to histograms. In addition, analysis of gaze data and verbal reports suggest that more experienced participants abandoned their initial strategy when necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • histogram
  • statistics education
  • eye-tracking
  • bar graphs
  • big ideas
  • misconception
  • statistical knowledge for teaching (STK)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revealing conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: an eye-tracking study: ICOTS10 (2018) Invited Paper - Refereed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this