Abstract
This chapter outlines the process of IPCC report writing and discusses, through specific examples, how these reports are produced within, and shaped by, political and scientific contexts. The IPCC produces Assessment Reports, Special Reports, and Methodological Reports, which are central to the institution’s operations and perceived impact. There are also sub-elements of these reports – Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summaries – which fulfil important standalone roles. The process of writing these reports is well-institutionalised and involves maintaining a balance between scientific credibility and policy relevance. The reports produced are therefore accountable to, and co-produced with, scientific and policy communities. The chapter shows how the framing of IPCC reports has changed over time and continues to evolve. This also raises questions about the future of IPCC reports in relation to IPCC processes and in response to diversifying audiences and new media.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
Editors | Kari de Pryck, Mike Hulme |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Chapter | 5 |
Pages | 39 - 48 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009082099 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- reports
- policy
- co-production
- policy accumulation
- policy neutrality
- framing
- Scientific community