Reply to Sitters and Olde Venterink: Untangling the relative importance of processes that influence fecal nutrient stoichiometry

Elizabeth le Roux*, Graham I. H. Kerley, Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Sitters and Olde Venterink (1) question the generality of the positive relationship that we show between herbivore body size and fecal N:P stoichiometry (2). Their data show different and at times opposite patterns. They highlight dietary composition and metabolic requirement as two additional size-related mechanisms determining fecal nutrient ratios and argue that the increased skeletal phosphorus requirements of larger animals that we suggest may not be the primary determinant of fecal P concentrations.We fully agree that dietary nutrients strongly determine fecal nutrients, and the latter often serves as a proxy for the former (3, 4). This is particularly clear when comparing grazers and browsers. However, in … ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: elizabeth.liza.le.roux{at}gmail.com.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020849118
Pages (from-to)1-2
Number of pages2
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume118
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
E.l.R. is funded by Royal Society Newton International Fellowship NIF\R1\192618.

Keywords

  • Animal Distribution
  • Animals
  • Body Size
  • Nutrients
  • Plants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Sitters and Olde Venterink: Untangling the relative importance of processes that influence fecal nutrient stoichiometry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this