Reply to Genç and Yürür's comments on: "Late Cretaceous extensional denudation along a marble detachment fault zone in the Kirşehir massif near Kaman, Central Turkey"

C.J.C. Lefebvre; A. Barnhoorn; D.J.J. van Hinsbergen; N. Kaymakçı; R.L.M. Vissers

doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2011.12.005

Reply to Genç and Yürür's comments on: "Late Cretaceous extensional denudation along a marble detachment fault zone in the Kirşehir massif near Kaman, Central Turkey"

C.J.C. Lefebvre, A. Barnhoorn, D.J.J. van Hinsbergen, N. Kaymakçı, R.L.M. Vissers

extern

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Two of the criticisms made by Genç and Yürür criticized Lefebvre et al. (2011) for not referring to their own previous work. In those cases, we have explained here why we decided not to do so. The other scientific comments mainly concerned issues that Genç and Yürür may have misunderstood and we have taken the opportunity to clarify these in this reply. We note that whilst Genç and Yürür commented on our paper, we infer that they agree with our main conclusion that the Kaman fault is an extensional detachment

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	90-93
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of Structural Geology
Volume	36
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.12.005
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jsg.2011.12.005

Cite this

@article{e6dd60a8f2494207a579f056056d3fe3,

title = "Reply to Gen{\c c} and Y{\"u}r{\"u}r's comments on: {"}Late Cretaceous extensional denudation along a marble detachment fault zone in the Kir{\c s}ehir massif near Kaman, Central Turkey{"}",

abstract = "Two of the criticisms made by Gen{\c c} and Y{\"u}r{\"u}r criticized Lefebvre et al. (2011) for not referring to their own previous work. In those cases, we have explained here why we decided not to do so. The other scientific comments mainly concerned issues that Gen{\c c} and Y{\"u}r{\"u}r may have misunderstood and we have taken the opportunity to clarify these in this reply. We note that whilst Gen{\c c} and Y{\"u}r{\"u}r commented on our paper, we infer that they agree with our main conclusion that the Kaman fault is an extensional detachment",

author = "C.J.C. Lefebvre and A. Barnhoorn and {van Hinsbergen}, D.J.J. and N. Kaymak{\c c}ı and R.L.M. Vissers",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1016/j.jsg.2011.12.005",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "90--93",

journal = "Journal of Structural Geology",

issn = "0191-8141",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Reply to Genç and Yürür's comments on: "Late Cretaceous extensional denudation along a marble detachment fault zone in the Kirşehir massif near Kaman, Central Turkey". / Lefebvre, C.J.C.; Barnhoorn, A.; van Hinsbergen, D.J.J. et al.
In: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 36, 2012, p. 90-93.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Genç and Yürür's comments on: "Late Cretaceous extensional denudation along a marble detachment fault zone in the Kirşehir massif near Kaman, Central Turkey"

AU - Lefebvre, C.J.C.

AU - Barnhoorn, A.

AU - van Hinsbergen, D.J.J.

AU - Kaymakçı, N.

AU - Vissers, R.L.M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Two of the criticisms made by Genç and Yürür criticized Lefebvre et al. (2011) for not referring to their own previous work. In those cases, we have explained here why we decided not to do so. The other scientific comments mainly concerned issues that Genç and Yürür may have misunderstood and we have taken the opportunity to clarify these in this reply. We note that whilst Genç and Yürür commented on our paper, we infer that they agree with our main conclusion that the Kaman fault is an extensional detachment

AB - Two of the criticisms made by Genç and Yürür criticized Lefebvre et al. (2011) for not referring to their own previous work. In those cases, we have explained here why we decided not to do so. The other scientific comments mainly concerned issues that Genç and Yürür may have misunderstood and we have taken the opportunity to clarify these in this reply. We note that whilst Genç and Yürür commented on our paper, we infer that they agree with our main conclusion that the Kaman fault is an extensional detachment

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2011.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2011.12.005

M3 - Article

SN - 0191-8141

VL - 36

SP - 90

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Structural Geology

JF - Journal of Structural Geology

ER -

Reply to Genç and Yürür's comments on: "Late Cretaceous extensional denudation along a marble detachment fault zone in the Kirşehir massif near Kaman, Central Turkey"

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this