Repeatability and reproducibility of the RTgill-W1 cell line assay for predicting fish acute toxicity

Melanie Fischer, Scott E. Belanger, Pascale Berckmans, Mary J. Bernhard, Ludek Bláha, Diana E.Coman Schmid, Scott D. Dyer, Tina Haupt, Joop L.M. Hermens, Maria T. Hultman, Heike Laue, Adam Lillicrap, Marie Mlnaříková, Andreas Natsch, Jiří Novák, Theo L. Sinnige, Knut Erik Tollefsen, Valentin Von Niederhäusern, Hilda Witters, Anze ZupaničKristin Schirmer*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Predicting fish acute toxicity of chemicals in vitro is an attractive alternative method to the conventional approach using juvenile and adult fish. The rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) cell line assay with RTgill-W1 cells has been designed for this purpose. It quantifies cell viability using fluorescent measurements for metabolic activity, cell- and lysosomalmembrane integrity on the same set of cells. Results from over 70 organic chemicals attest to the high predictive capacity of this test. We here report on the repeatability (intralaboratory variability) and reproducibility (interlaboratory variability) of the RTgill-W1 cell line assay in a round-robin study focusing on 6 test chemicals involving 6 laboratories from the industrial and academic sector. All participating laboratories were able to establish the assay according to preset quality criteria even though, apart from the lead laboratory, none had previously worked with the RTgill-W1 cell line. Concentration-response modeling, based on either nominal or geometric mean-derived measured concentrations, yielded effect concentrations (EC50) that spanned approximately 4 orders of magnitude over the chemical range, covering all fish acute toxicity categories. Coefficients of variation for intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability for the average of the 3 fluorescent cell viability measurements were 15.5% and 30.8%, respectively, which is comparable to other fish-derived, small-scale bioassays. This study therefore underlines the robustness of the RTgill-W1 cell line assay and its accurate performance when carried out by operators in different laboratory settings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)353-364
    Number of pages12
    JournalToxicological Sciences
    Volume169
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

    Funding

    We gratefully acknowledge funding of this round-robin study by CEFIC-LRI and UK NC3Rs (CEllSens Eco8.3). Significant additional resources were provided by the participating laboratories either in-kind or through grants: to RECETOX infrastructure (LM2015051 and CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/ 16_013/0001761); to NIVA (Research Council of Norway project # 196318, ‘Non-animal [alternative] testing methods for REACH alterREACH’; Hultman, Lillicrap and Tollefsen).

    Keywords

    • In vitro alternatives
    • Round-robin study
    • Validation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Repeatability and reproducibility of the RTgill-W1 cell line assay for predicting fish acute toxicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this