TY - JOUR
T1 - Reparatiestrategieën bij onbegrip in een chatbotgesprek
AU - Liebrecht, Christine
AU - van Miltenburg, Emiel
AU - van Hooijdonk, Charlotte
AU - Kunneman, Florian
AU - Merckens, Anouk
AU - Niessen, Nik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Christine Liebrecht, Emiel van Miltenburg, Charlotte van Hooijdonk, Florian Kunneman, Anouk Merckens & Nik Niessen.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - How can chatbots undo their mistakes? Repair strategies for misunderstandings in a chatbot conversation This paper presents a taxonomy of chatbot repair strategies identif ied in the f ields of communication science and dialogue systems. Subsequently, two experimental studies investigated the effects of miscommunication in chatbot conversations. In both experiments, participants engaged f irst in a successful and then a (manipulated) unsuccessful chatbot conversation. The unsuccessful chatbot responded to the misunderstanding with either defensive or accommodative repair strategies. The f indings of both studies reveal the negative impact of an unsuccessful chatbot conversation on brand attitude compared to a successful chatbot conversation. However, if the chatbot uses an accommodative repair strategy, brand attitude is rated higher than if the chatbot uses a defensive repair strategy. Also, study 2 showed that the chatbot’s communicated expertise (being an expert vs. in training) does not impact this relation. Thus, the way in which misunderstanding is communicated by the chatbot is more important than the expertise exhibited by the chatbot.
AB - How can chatbots undo their mistakes? Repair strategies for misunderstandings in a chatbot conversation This paper presents a taxonomy of chatbot repair strategies identif ied in the f ields of communication science and dialogue systems. Subsequently, two experimental studies investigated the effects of miscommunication in chatbot conversations. In both experiments, participants engaged f irst in a successful and then a (manipulated) unsuccessful chatbot conversation. The unsuccessful chatbot responded to the misunderstanding with either defensive or accommodative repair strategies. The f indings of both studies reveal the negative impact of an unsuccessful chatbot conversation on brand attitude compared to a successful chatbot conversation. However, if the chatbot uses an accommodative repair strategy, brand attitude is rated higher than if the chatbot uses a defensive repair strategy. Also, study 2 showed that the chatbot’s communicated expertise (being an expert vs. in training) does not impact this relation. Thus, the way in which misunderstanding is communicated by the chatbot is more important than the expertise exhibited by the chatbot.
KW - brand attitude
KW - chatbots
KW - miscommunication
KW - misunderstanding
KW - online customer service
KW - quality of interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199512486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5117/tCW2024.3.003.LiEB
DO - 10.5117/tCW2024.3.003.LiEB
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199512486
SN - 1384-6930
VL - 52
SP - 288
EP - 325
JO - Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap
JF - Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap
IS - 3
ER -