Removal of sarcolemmal sialic acid residues results in a loss of sarcolemmal functioning and integrity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Treatment of neonatal rat heart cells with neuraminidase results in a large increase of cellular-associated Ca2+. The study described below was designed to test the hypothesis that neuraminidase produces its effects by increasing the transient Ca2+ channel current, as proposed by Yee et al. (24). This I(Ca,T) can be inactivated by dodecylsulfate (DDS) (17). The experimental data show that 1) the increase in cellular Ca2+ during neuraminidase treatment cannot be explained by an increased I(Ca,T); 2) neuraminidase treatment has a much more profound effect on sarcolemmal permeability than has been recognized previously; and 3) the effect of neuraminidase treatment can be prevented by 50 μM DDS. The study indicates that glycocalyxlipid bilayer interactions are important in maintenance of selective permeability of the sarcolemma. The protective effect of 50 μM DDS is probably mediated by insertion of the negatively charged amphiphilic molecule in the sarcolemma, although the exact mechanism remains to be elucidated.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology
Volume263
Issue number1 32-1
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jan 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cell lysis
  • cultured neonatal cells
  • glycocalyx
  • ion fluxes
  • neuraminidase
  • calcium channel
  • dodecyl sulfate
  • sialic acid
  • sialidase
  • animal tissue
  • article
  • calcium cell level
  • calcium current
  • calcium transport
  • cell membrane permeability
  • controlled study
  • cytolysis
  • cardiac muscle cell
  • heart muscle fiber membrane
  • ion current
  • muscle fiber contraction
  • newborn
  • nonhuman
  • potassium transport
  • priority journal
  • rat

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Removal of sarcolemmal sialic acid residues results in a loss of sarcolemmal functioning and integrity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this