TY - JOUR
T1 - Relating Latent Class Membership to Continuous Distal Outcomes
T2 - Improving the LTB Approach and a Modified Three-Step Implementation
AU - Bakk, Zsuzsa
AU - Oberski, Daniel L.
AU - Vermunt, Jeroen K.
PY - 2016/3/3
Y1 - 2016/3/3
N2 - Latent class analysis often aims to relate the classes to continuous external consequences (“distal outcomes”), but estimating such relationships necessitates distributional assumptions. Lanza, Tan, and Bray (2013) suggested circumventing such assumptions with their LTB approach: Linear logistic regression of latent class membership on each distal outcome is first used, after which this estimated relationship is reversed using Bayes’ rule. However, the LTB approach currently has 3 drawbacks, which we address in this article. First, LTB interchanges the assumption of normality for one of homoskedasticity, or, equivalently, of linearity of the logistic regression, leading to bias. Fortunately, we show introducing higher order terms prevents this bias. Second, we improve coverage rates by replacing approximate standard errors with resampling methods. Finally, we introduce a bias-corrected 3-step version of LTB as a practical alternative to standard LTB. The improved LTB methods are validated by a simulation study, and an example application demonstrates their usefulness.
AB - Latent class analysis often aims to relate the classes to continuous external consequences (“distal outcomes”), but estimating such relationships necessitates distributional assumptions. Lanza, Tan, and Bray (2013) suggested circumventing such assumptions with their LTB approach: Linear logistic regression of latent class membership on each distal outcome is first used, after which this estimated relationship is reversed using Bayes’ rule. However, the LTB approach currently has 3 drawbacks, which we address in this article. First, LTB interchanges the assumption of normality for one of homoskedasticity, or, equivalently, of linearity of the logistic regression, leading to bias. Fortunately, we show introducing higher order terms prevents this bias. Second, we improve coverage rates by replacing approximate standard errors with resampling methods. Finally, we introduce a bias-corrected 3-step version of LTB as a practical alternative to standard LTB. The improved LTB methods are validated by a simulation study, and an example application demonstrates their usefulness.
KW - distal outcome
KW - latent class analysis
KW - LTB approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957434584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10705511.2015.1049698
DO - 10.1080/10705511.2015.1049698
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957434584
SN - 1070-5511
VL - 23
SP - 278
EP - 289
JO - Structural Equation Modeling
JF - Structural Equation Modeling
IS - 2
ER -