Abstract
Tavecchio’s paper states that RCTs are impractical in the daily practice of
social work and public health professionals. He argues that its external validity is
limited and that the application of knowledge acquired by stringent application of
RCTs takes too long. I believe his arguments are a little off and I shall argue why.
social work and public health professionals. He argues that its external validity is
limited and that the application of knowledge acquired by stringent application of
RCTs takes too long. I believe his arguments are a little off and I shall argue why.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-68 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Methodological Review of Applied Research |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Open AccessUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rejoinder “Effectiveness in practice-based research: Looking for alternatives to the randomized controlled trial (RCT).” Why and when Randomized Controlled Trials are a necessity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver