Regulatory agency reputation acquisition: A Q Methodology analysis of the views of agency employees

Lauren A. Fahy*, Erik Hans Klijn, Judith van Erp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article reports findings of a Q Methodology study in which we explored the opinions of employees from eight Dutch regulatory agencies on how agencies gain their reputation. This is the largest study to date examining employee's views on the relative importance of different factors in reputation acquisition by public organizations, and the first analyzing employees in regulatory agencies. Results reveal five distinct “profiles” of opinion among employees about the factors most important in reputation acquisition. Regression analysis, further, supports that different regulatory agencies are dominated by employees with different opinions on how reputation is formed. These findings contribute to the growing empirical literature on how regulatory agencies, and their various employees, understand and approach reputation management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-125
Number of pages22
JournalRegulation and Governance
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date9 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Regulation & Governance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Funding

Our study was funded by the Dutch Research Council under its Innovation of Supervision program. It is part of the Supervision with Authority project (NWA.1334.19.007). Special thanks to: Dr. Rianne Warsen (Erasmus University); Kim Kikstra, Lisa van Dam, and the entire 'Toezicht met Gezag' research team; the 'Toezicht met Gezag' professional consortium - The Authority for Consumers and Markets; The Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate; The Dutch Mining Authority; DCMR Rijnmond Environmental Service; and The Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority; and our reviewers.

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNWA.1334.19.007
Dutch Research Council under its Innovation of Supervision program
Dutch Mining Authority
DCMR Rijnmond Environmental Service
Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority

    Keywords

    • bureaucratic reputation
    • communications
    • regulatory agencies
    • reputation management
    • stakeholder management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Regulatory agency reputation acquisition: A Q Methodology analysis of the views of agency employees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this