Regional Assessment of Urban Impacts on Landcover and Open Space Finds a Smart Urban Growth Policy Performs Little Better than Business as Usual

  • James H. Thorne*
  • , Maria J. Santos
  • , Jacquelyn H. Bjorkman
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Assessment of landscape change is critical for attainment of regional sustainability goals. Urban growth assessments are needed because over half the global population now lives in cities, which impact biodiversity, ecosystem structure and ecological processes. Open space protection is needed to preserve these attributes, and provide the resources humans need. The San Francisco Bay Area, California, is challenged to accommodate a population increase of 3.07 million while maintaining the region's ecosystems and biodiversity. Our analysis of 9275 km(2) in the Bay Area links historic trends for three measures: urban growth, protected open space, and landcover types over the last 70 years to future 2050 projections of urban growth and open space. Protected open space totaled 348 km(2) (3.7% of the area) in 1940, and expanded to 2221 km(2) (20.2%) currently. An additional 1038 km(2) of protected open space is targeted (35.1%). Urban area historically increased from 396.5 km(2) to 2239 km(2) (24.1% of the area). Urban growth during this time mostly occurred at the expense of agricultural landscapes (62.9%) rather than natural vegetation. Smart Growth development has been advanced as a preferred alternative in many planning circles, but we found that it conserved only marginally more open space than Business-as-usual when using an urban growth model to portray policies for future urban growth. Scenarios to 2050 suggest urban development on non-urban lands of 1091, 956, or 179 km(2), under Business-as-usual, Smart Growth and Infill policy growth scenarios, respectively. The Smart Growth policy converts 88% of natural lands and agriculture used by Business-as-usual, while Infill used only 40% of those lands. Given the historic rate of urban growth, 0.25%/ year, and limited space available, the Infill scenario is recommended. While the data may differ, the use of an historic and future framework to track these three variables can be easily applied to other metropolitan areas.

Original languageEnglish
Article number65258
Number of pages9
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Funding for this project came from NSF award 0819493, California Public Interest Energy Research grants, PIER-500-08-006, PIER-500-09-037, and the Bill Lane Center for the American West, the Spatial History Project and the Wallenberg Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Keywords

  • LAND-USE
  • UNITED-STATES
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE
  • CALIFORNIA
  • URBANIZATION
  • CONSERVATION
  • LANDSCAPE
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • BIODIVERSITY
  • INFORMATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional Assessment of Urban Impacts on Landcover and Open Space Finds a Smart Urban Growth Policy Performs Little Better than Business as Usual'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this