Refining victims’ self-reports on bullying: Assessing frequency, intensity, power imbalance, and goal-directedness

Tessa Kaufman*, Gijs Huitsing, René Veenstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Bullying can be differentiated from other types of peer aggression by four key characteristics: frequency, intensity, power imbalance, and goal‐directedness. Existing instruments, however, usually assess the presence of these characteristics implicitly. Can self‐report instruments be refined using additional questions that assess each characteristic? We examined (a) what proportion of children classified as victims by the commonly used Revised Olweus’ bully/victim questionnaire (BVQ) also experienced the characteristics of bullying, and (b) the extent to which the presence of the characteristics was associated with emotional (affect, school, and classroom well‐being), relational (friendship, defending), and social status (popularity, rejection) adjustment correlates among victims. Using data from 1,738 students (Mage = 10.6; grades 5–8), including 138 victims according to the BVQ, the results showed that 43.1% of the children who were classified as victims by BVQ experienced all the four characteristics of bullying. Frequency ratings of victimization did not capture experiences that involved a power imbalance. Victims who reported all four key characteristics had greater emotional, relational, and social status problems than victims who did not report all characteristics. Thus, researchers who focus on victimization for diagnostic and prevention purposes can enrich self‐report measurements of bullying victimization by adding questions that assess the characteristics explicitly.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-390
JournalSocial Development
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Refining victims’ self-reports on bullying: Assessing frequency, intensity, power imbalance, and goal-directedness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this