Reducing underreports of behaviors in retrospective surveys: the effects of three different strategies

P.J. Lugtig, T.J. Glasner, Anja Boeve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Panel surveys routinely ask respondents retrospectively about events or facts that occurred since the last interview. Earlier research has documented that events occurring in between two interviews remain underreported. This paper studies the effect of three question formats for estimating annual use of a Family Physician (FP), i.e., 1-month retrospective questions, a 12-month retrospective question without a recall aid, and a 12-month retrospective question with a timeline recall aid. Our results show that the three question formats lead to very different estimates for annual FP use which were all lower than a population estimate based on register data. The timeline with landmarks did not significantly improve retrospective recall and reporting of Family Physician use for the one-year period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583–595
JournalInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date5 Sept 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing underreports of behaviors in retrospective surveys: the effects of three different strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this