(Re)constructing Reflexivity: A Relational Constructionist Approach

  • D.M. Hosking
  • , B. Pluut

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This article distinguishes three discourses of reflexivity in relation to human inquiry. One of these arises from a post-modern, relational constructionist perspective which radically re-conceptualizes reflexivity: (a) as a local and co-constructed process oriented towards the question (b) how are we 'going on' together, and therefore paying attention to (c) the realities and relations we are co-creating during the research process and so (d) is concerned with local pragmatic and ethical issues (Gergen & Hosking, 2006; McNamee, 1994) rather than with the quality of truth claims. Regular reflexive dialogues as part of, and directed at, the research process can heighten the local use value of research for all participants and can facilitate new possible realities and relations. Key Words: Reflexivity, Relational Responsibility, Responsive Inquiry, Relational Constructionism, Postmodernism, and Ethics
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)59-75
    Number of pages17
    JournalThe Qualitative Report
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '(Re)constructing Reflexivity: A Relational Constructionist Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this