Reconciling links between diversity and population stability across global plant communities

  • Xiaobin Pan*
  • , Yann Hautier
  • , Jan Lepš
  • , Shaopeng Wang
  • , Kathryn E Barry
  • , Manuele Bazzichetto
  • , Stefano Chelli
  • , Jiří Doležal
  • , Nico Eisenhauer
  • , Franz Essl
  • , Felícia M Fischer
  • , Oscar Godoy
  • , Daniel Gómez-García
  • , Lars Götzenberger
  • , Clara Gracia
  • , Anaclara Guido
  • , Lauren M Hallett
  • , Susan Harrison
  • , Miao He
  • , Andrew Hector
  • Pubin Hong, Forest Isbell, George A Kowalchuk, Victor Lecegui, Xiaofei Li, Maowei Liang, Frédérique Louault, Maria Májeková, Rob Marrs, Neha Mohanbabu, Akira S Mori, Robin J Pakeman, Alain Paquette, Begoña Peco, Josep Peñuelas, Valério D Pillar, Marta Rueda, Wolfgang Schmidt, Jules Segrestin, Marta Gaia Sperandii, Enrique Valencia, Vigdis Vandvik, Shengnan Wang, David Ward, Susan Wiser, Ben A Woodcock, Chong Xu, Truman Young, Fei-Hai Yu, Liting Zheng, Zhiwei Zhong, Francesco de Bello
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Maintaining ecological stability is essential for sustaining ecosystem functions and the benefits they provide to society. Ecological theory predicts that plant diversity destabilizes local populations, yet empirical studies report variable effects. We hypothesize that this discrepancy arises at least in part from differences captured by different diversity (average vs cumulative richness, i.e. the mean annual richness vs the cumulative richness across years) and stability metrics (abundance-unweighted vs weighted mean population stability). To test this, we analyzed data from > 8000 permanent vegetation plots across biomes on five continents. We found a negative (i.e. destabilizing) diversity-stability relationship when using abundance-weighted rather than unweighted measures of population stability, which are more influenced by dominant species. Similarly, cumulative richness - capturing total species occurrence over time and long-term turnover - reveals a stronger destabilizing effect compared to average annual richness. Our findings reveal that, when specific metrics of diversity and stability are considered, more species and potentially the associated increase in interspecific competition tend to destabilize populations across natural ecosystems world-wide - particularly those of dominant species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-165
JournalThe New phytologist
Volume250
Issue number1
Early online date16 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). New Phytologist © 2026 New Phytologist Foundation.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Grant No. PID2023‐152801NB‐I00) and benefited from the Biodiversity on a Changing Planet program (DEB‐2224852). Xiaobin Pan was funded by the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 202206620034). We also acknowledge the numerous funding sources that have supported the creation and long‐term maintenance of the diverse projects included in the LOTVS database. We disclose that the manuscript was written entirely by the authors, with support from ChatGPT used to improve text clarity and expression.

FundersFunder number
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Agencia Estatal de InvestigaciónPID2023‐152801NB‐I00, DEB‐2224852
China Scholarship Council202206620034

    Keywords

    • average richness
    • biodiversity
    • cumulative richness
    • dominance
    • populations
    • rare species
    • unweighted and weighted population stability

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reconciling links between diversity and population stability across global plant communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this