Reactions to no-fault compensation schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands: the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in authorities

Marlou Overheul*, Kees Van den Bos, Rianka Rijnhout

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Financial redress for victims of occupational diseases can be offered through no-fault compensation schemes. No-fault compensation schemes have an explicit mission in promoting perceived fairness and justice. The objective is to offer a quick, fair and just procedure and outcome, while preventing civil court procedures and restoring trust. However, the question is whether applicants of these no-fault schemes indeed experience perceived fairness and justice. This paper discusses the result of an in-depth interview study with fifty-eight victims involved in no-fault schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands. We focus on the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in the (former) employer.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Keywords

  • compensation law
  • no-fault compensation schemes
  • occupational diseases
  • procedural justice
  • tort law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reactions to no-fault compensation schemes for occupational diseases in the Netherlands: the role of perceived procedural justice, outcome concerns and trust in authorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this