Abstract
‘Subitizing’ refers to fast and accurate judgement
of small numerosities, whereas for larger numerosities either
counting or estimation are used. Counting is slow and precise,
whereas estimation is fast but imprecise. In this study
consisting of five experiments we investigated if and how the
numerosity judgement process is affected by the relative
spacing between the presented numerosities. To this end we
let subjects judge the number of dots presented on a screen
and recorded their response times. Our results show that
subjects switch from counting to estimation if the relative
differences between subsequent numerosities are large
(a factor of 2), but that numerosity judgement in the
subitizing range was still faster. We also show this fast
performance for small numerosities only occurred when
numerosity information is present. This indicates this is
typical for number processing and not magnitude estimation
in general. Furthermore, comparison with a previous haptic
study suggests similar processing in numerosity judgement
through haptics and vision.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 525-537 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Experimental Brain Research |
| Volume | 204 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Range dependent processing of visual numerosity : similarities across vision and haptics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver