TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines : a review of uncertainties and their impacts
AU - Koornneef, J.M.
AU - Spruijt, M.
AU - Molag, M.
AU - Ramírez-Ramírez, A.
AU - Turkenburg, W.C.
AU - Faaij, A.P.C.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - A systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs) for CO2 pipelines is presented. Sources of uncertainties that have been assessed are: failure rates, pipeline pressure, temperature, section length, diameter, orifice size, type and direction of release, meteorological conditions, jet diameter, vapour mass fraction in the release and the dose–effect relationship for CO2. A sensitivity analysis with these parameters is performed using release, dispersion and impact models. The results show that the knowledge gaps and uncertainties have a large effect on the accuracy of the assessed risks of CO2 pipelines. In this study it is found that the individual risk contour can vary between 0 and 204 m from the pipeline depending on assumptions made. In existing studies this range is found to be between
AB - A systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs) for CO2 pipelines is presented. Sources of uncertainties that have been assessed are: failure rates, pipeline pressure, temperature, section length, diameter, orifice size, type and direction of release, meteorological conditions, jet diameter, vapour mass fraction in the release and the dose–effect relationship for CO2. A sensitivity analysis with these parameters is performed using release, dispersion and impact models. The results show that the knowledge gaps and uncertainties have a large effect on the accuracy of the assessed risks of CO2 pipelines. In this study it is found that the individual risk contour can vary between 0 and 204 m from the pipeline depending on assumptions made. In existing studies this range is found to be between
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068
M3 - Article
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 177
SP - 12
EP - 27
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
IS - 1-3
ER -