Public attitudes towards support for migrants: the importance of perceived voluntary and involuntary migration

Maykel Verkuyten*, Kieran Mepham, Mathijs Kros

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Immigration leads to strong and polarized public and political debates in Europe and the Western world more generally. In some of these debates, migrants are described as either having little choice but to migrate (involuntary) or as migrating out of their own free choice (voluntary). In two studies and using a social psychological perspective, native Dutch respondents were asked about their support for policies aimed at cultural rights and public assistance to perceived voluntary and involuntary migrants. Study 1 showed that stronger agreement with migration being voluntary was associated with lower policy support, while agreement with migration being involuntary was independently associated with higher support. In Study 2 the degree of support was examined as a consequence of feelings of empathy and anger. Perceived involuntariness of migration elicited feelings of empathy and therefore higher support for newcomers. In contrast, perceived voluntariness elicited stronger anger and therefore less support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)901-918
Number of pages18
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • (in)voluntary
  • attitudes
  • emotions
  • Immigration
  • public
  • rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public attitudes towards support for migrants: the importance of perceived voluntary and involuntary migration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this