Psychometric properties of the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale

Eva M. Janssen*, Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen, Anita E.G. Heijltjes, Tim Mainhard, Lara M. van Peppen, Tamara van Gog

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The Actively Open-minded Thinking scale (AOT; Stanovich & West, 2007) is a questionnaire that is used to measure the disposition towards rational thinking as a single psychological trait. Yet, despite its frequent use, also in abbreviated form, it is still unclear whether sumscores of the AOT can actually be used to order individuals on their disposition towards actively open-minded thinking and whether the questionnaire can be validly shortened. The present study aimed to obtain a valid and shorter AOT. We conducted Mokken scale analyses on the (Dutch) AOT using two samples of higher education students (N = 930; N = 509). Our analyses showed that none of the 41 items could discriminate sufficiently between respondents with varying latent trait levels. Furthermore, no item-set of the AOT could be obtained to validly order individuals on the assumed latent trait, which is a crucial assumption when using it in research. Consequently, it is questionable whether scores on the AOT provide insights into the concept it aims to measure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100659
Number of pages12
JournalThinking Skills and Creativity
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

Funding

This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research under project number 409-15-203. The authors would like to thank Renske Kuijpers for her assistance with the data analysis.

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Dutch-language version of the Actively open-Minded Thinking scale
  • Mokken scale analysis
  • Rational thinking
  • Reasoning and decision-making
  • Thinking dispositions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric properties of the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this