Procedural-type Review: A More Neutral Approach to Human Rights Protection by the European Court of Human Rights?

L.M. Huijbers

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperOther research output

    Abstract

    The European Court of Human Rights appears to be increasingly applying procedural-type review. This means that the Court looks into the quality of the decision-making process of the national legislative, executive or judicial authority to determine whether there has been a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights. This paper addresses the questions whether and to what extent this procedural approach of the Court can be regarded as a more neutral approach towards the political choices of the European States, when compared to an approach where the Court looks into the substantive balance struck in the national authorities’ decisions. For analysing the potential neutrality of procedural-type review, this paper develops a theoretical framework on the basis of Martti Koskenniemi’s theory on the neutrality of international law. On the basis of this framework, it concludes that although procedural-type review as an abstract review method could be considered as a relatively neutral approach of the Strasbourg Court towards the political choices of States, in practice the approach loses much of its initial neutral potential.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages1-23
    Number of pages24
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2017
    EventESIL Research Forum: The Neutrality of International Law: Myth or Reality? - Spain, Granada
    Duration: 30 Mar 201731 Mar 2017
    http://esilrf2017.dipri.org/

    Conference

    ConferenceESIL Research Forum
    CityGranada
    Period30/03/1731/03/17
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Procedural review
    • Human rights
    • European Court of Human Rights
    • Neutrality of International Law
    • Neutrality of interpretation techniques and review methods
    • Martti Koskenniemi

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural-type Review: A More Neutral Approach to Human Rights Protection by the European Court of Human Rights?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this