Probabilistic Deontic Logics for Reasoning about Uncertain Norms

Vincent de Wit, Dragan Doder, John-Jules Meyer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this article, we present a proof-theoretical and model-theoretical approach
    to probabilistic logic for reasoning about uncertainty about normative state-
    ments. We introduce two logics with languages that extend both the language
    of monadic deontic logic and the language of probabilistic logic. The first logic
    allows statements like “the probability that one is obliged to be quiet is at least
    0.9”. The second logic allows iteration of probabilities in the language. We
    axiomatize both logics, provide the corresponding semantics and prove that the
    axiomatizations are sound and complete. We also prove that both logics are
    decidable. In addition, we show that the problem of deciding satisfiability for
    the simpler of our two logics is in PSPACE, no worse than that of deontic logic.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)193-220
    JournalJournal of Applied Logics
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2023, College Publications. All rights reserved.

    Keywords

    • Completeness
    • Decidability
    • MDL
    • Normative reasoning
    • Probabilistic logic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Probabilistic Deontic Logics for Reasoning about Uncertain Norms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this