Abstract
Questionable research practices (QRPs), such as p-hacking (i.e., the inappropriate manipulation of data analysis to find statistical significance) and post hoc hypothesizing, are threats to the replicability of research findings. One key solu tion to the problem of QRPs is preregistration. This refers to time-stamped docu mentation that describes the methodology and statistical analyses of a study before the data are collected or inspected. As such, readers of the study’s report can evalu ate whether the described research is in line with the planned methods and analyses or whether there are deviations from these (e.g., analyses performed so that the research hypotheses is confirmed). Here, we aim to describe what preregistration entails and why it is useful for psychology research. In this vein, we present the key elements of a sufficient preregistration file, its advantages as well as its disadvan tages, and why preregistration is a key, yet partially insufficient, solution against QRPs. By the end of this chapter, we hope that readers are convinced that there is little reason not to preregister their research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology |
Editors | William O'Donohue, Akihiko Masuda, Scott Lilienfeld |
Place of Publication | Cham |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Chapter | 15 |
Pages | 343-357 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Edition | 1 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-031-04968-2 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-031-04967-5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- Clinical science
- Psychological science
- Preregistration
- Questionable research practices