Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: Is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?

  • Eric W. Seabloom
  • , Elizabeth T. Borer
  • , Yvonne Buckley
  • , Elsa E. Cleland
  • , Kendi Davies
  • , Jennifer Firn
  • , W. Stanley Harpole
  • , Yann Hautier
  • , Eric Lind
  • , Andrew Macdougall
  • , John L. Orrock
  • , Suzanne M. Prober
  • , Peter Adler
  • , Juan Alberti
  • , T. Michael Anderson
  • , Jonathan D. Bakker
  • , Lori A. Biederman
  • , Dana Blumenthal
  • , Cynthia S. Brown
  • , Lars A. Brudvig
  • Maria Caldeira, Chengjin Chu, Michael J. Crawley, Pedro Daleo, Ellen I. Damschen, Carla M. D'Antonio, Nicole M. Decrappeo, Chris R. Dickman, Guozhen Du, Philip A. Fay, Paul Frater, Daniel S. Gruner, Nicole Hagenah, Andrew Hector, Aveliina Helm, Helmut Hillebrand, Kirsten S. Hofmockel, Hope C. Humphries, Oscar Iribarne, Virginia L. Jin, Adam Kay, Kevin P. Kirkman, Julia A. Klein, Johannes M. H. Knops, Kimberly J. La Pierre, Laura M. Ladwig, John G. Lambrinos, Andrew D. B. Leakey, Qi Li, Wei Li, Rebecca Mcculley, Brett Melbourne, Charles E. Mitchell, Joslin L. Moore, John Morgan, Brent Mortensen, Lydia R. O'Halloran, Meelis Pärtel, Jesús Pascual, David A. Pyke, Anita C. Risch, Roberto Salguero-Gómez, Mahesh Sankaran, Martin Schuetz, Anna Simonsen, Melinda Smith, Carly Stevens, Lauren Sullivan, Glenda M. Wardle, Elizabeth M. Wolkovich, Peter D. Wragg, Justin Wright, Louie Yang
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • University of Queensland
  • University of California Office of the President
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Iowa State University
  • University of Zurich
  • University of Guelph
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • CSIRO
  • Utah State University
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Wake Forest University
  • University of Washington
  • Rangeland Resources Research Unit
  • Colorado State University
  • Michigan State University
  • Technical University of Lisbon
  • School of Life Sciences
  • Imperial College London
  • U.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center
  • University of Sydney
  • USDA-ARS Grassland Soil and Water Research Lab
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Yale University
  • University of Tartu
  • Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment
  • USDA-ARS Agroecosystem Management Research Unit
  • University of St. Thomas
  • School of Biological Sciences
  • University of New Mexico
  • Oregon State University
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Southwest Forestry University
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Melbourne
  • La Trobe University
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
  • National Centre for Biological Sciences
  • University of Toronto
  • Lancaster University
  • University of British Columbia
  • Duke University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species' relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3677-3687
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume19
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • article
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem
  • introduced species
  • physiology
  • plant dispersal
  • Poaceae

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: Is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this