Predicting different grades in different ways for selective admission: Disentangling the first-year grade point average

Sebastiaan C. Steenman*, Wieger E. Bakker, Jan W F van Tartwijk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The first-year grade point average (FYGPA) is the predominant measure of student success in most studies on university admission. Previous cognitive achievements measured with high school grades or standardized tests have been found to be the strongest predictors of FYGPA. For this reason, standardized tests measuring cognitive achievement are widely used as a tool for selective admission to higher education. The FYGPA, however, measures many markedly different aspects of student success. In this article it is shown that when the FYGPA is divided into averages that reflect performance on different types of goals, the predictive value of previous cognitive achievement differs significantly between these disentangled averages. It is therefore important to distinguish between different types of goals when considering what student success is, and which students should be admitted to particular university programmes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1408-1423
Number of pages16
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Dublin descriptors
  • grades
  • selective admissions
  • student success
  • taxonomy of educational objectives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting different grades in different ways for selective admission: Disentangling the first-year grade point average'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this