TY - JOUR
T1 - Practical paths towards quantifying and mitigating agricultural methane emissions
AU - Nisbet, Euan
AU - Manning, Martin R.
AU - Lowry, David
AU - Fisher, Rebecca E.
AU - Lan, Xin
AU - Michel, Sylvia E.
AU - France, James
AU - Nisbet, R. Ellen R.
AU - Bakkaloglu, Semra
AU - Leitner, Sonja
AU - Brooke, Charles
AU - Röckmann, Thomas
AU - Allen, Grant
AU - van der Gon, Hugo A. C. Denier
AU - Merbold, Lutz
AU - Scheutz, Charlotte
AU - Maisch, Ceres Woolley
AU - Nisbet-Jones, Peter
AU - Alshalan, Aliah
AU - Fernandez, Julianne M.
AU - Dlugokencky, Ed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - This review summarizes the rapid advances in direct practical methods to quantify and reduce agricultural methane emissions worldwide. Major tasks are location, identification, quantification and distinction between different specific sources (often multiple emitters such as manure pools, animal housing, biodigesters and landfills are co-located). Emission reduction, facilitated by developing methodologies for locating hot spots, is the least-cost choice for action, especially from manure stores, biodigesters and from controlling biomass burning. Agricultural methane can also be used to generate electricity or, in appropriate circumstances, can be destroyed by oxidation. It may be possible to cut North American, East Asian and European emissions sharply and rapidly. In Africa and South Asia, emissions from crop waste and food waste in landfills, also a source of air pollution, can be sharply and quickly reduced. Globally, cutting total annual agricultural and waste emissions by a third would demand reductions of very approximately 75 Tg yr−1. Apportioned by source type, notional cuts might be 30–40 Tg yr−1 from livestock and manure, 5-10 Tg yr−1 from rice cultivation and 20 Tg yr−1 or more from specifically agricultural waste.
AB - This review summarizes the rapid advances in direct practical methods to quantify and reduce agricultural methane emissions worldwide. Major tasks are location, identification, quantification and distinction between different specific sources (often multiple emitters such as manure pools, animal housing, biodigesters and landfills are co-located). Emission reduction, facilitated by developing methodologies for locating hot spots, is the least-cost choice for action, especially from manure stores, biodigesters and from controlling biomass burning. Agricultural methane can also be used to generate electricity or, in appropriate circumstances, can be destroyed by oxidation. It may be possible to cut North American, East Asian and European emissions sharply and rapidly. In Africa and South Asia, emissions from crop waste and food waste in landfills, also a source of air pollution, can be sharply and quickly reduced. Globally, cutting total annual agricultural and waste emissions by a third would demand reductions of very approximately 75 Tg yr−1. Apportioned by source type, notional cuts might be 30–40 Tg yr−1 from livestock and manure, 5-10 Tg yr−1 from rice cultivation and 20 Tg yr−1 or more from specifically agricultural waste.
KW - atmospheric methane
KW - greenhouse gases (methane, NO)
KW - manure
KW - methane mitigation (agriculture)
KW - ruminant emissions
U2 - 10.1098/rspa.2024.0390
DO - 10.1098/rspa.2024.0390
M3 - Article
SN - 0950-1207
VL - 481
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
IS - 2309
M1 - 20240390
ER -