Polyparameter linear free energy models for polyacrylate fiber-water partition coefficients to evaluate the efficiency of solid-phase microextraction

Satoshi Endo*, Steven T J Droge, Kai-Uwe Goss

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The fiber-water partition coefficient, Kfw, is decisive for performance of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) techniques in organic chemical analyses. In this study, polyacrylate (PA)-coated fiber was evaluated for its Kfw values toward diverse neutral organic compounds. Literature Kfw data were thoroughly evaluated, and additional Kfw values for 69 compounds were measured in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at 37 °C. These Kfw data, spanning over 6 orders of magnitude, were used to construct polyparameter linear free energy relationship (PP-LFER) models. The PP-LFER models fit well to the data with a standard deviation of 0.15-0.23 log units. Additional experiments indicated that the differences in temperature (25 vs 37 °C), electrolyte concentrations (pure water vs PBS), and conditioning methods (heat vs methanol) had only minor influences (<0.3 log units) on Kfw. Using the established PP-LFERs, the SPME extraction efficiency of PA coating toward compounds of differing polarity was evaluated in comparison to poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) coating. PA exhibited higher extraction capacities for H-bond donor compounds (e.g., phenols, anilines, amides, and many drugs and pesticides) with the estimated Kfw values being 1-4 log units higher than those of PDMS. Also, PA was shown to be more efficient than PDMS for hydrophobic aromatic compounds.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1394-1400
    Number of pages7
    JournalAnalytical Chemistry
    Volume83
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Polyparameter linear free energy models for polyacrylate fiber-water partition coefficients to evaluate the efficiency of solid-phase microextraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this