Plurality of expert knowledge: public planners’ experience with urban contractualism in Amsterdam

Tuna Tasan-Kok, Martijn van den Hurk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the Dutch planning experience in understanding how planners, as government actors, learn to deal with contracts in complex partnerships with private sector actors. It does so in order to question the technocratic logics of contemporary public–private partnerships (PPPs) focusing on an institutional context where public governments still retain a major leading role in planning for urban development but increasingly operate by devising financial agreements with the private sector. This chapter specifically looks at the use of ‘contracts’ in urban development. Consensus building in the Netherlands is the key approach in any decision-making process, implemented through the ‘polder model’, which is defined as harmonious patterns of interaction between social partners. The Dutch experience demonstrates very clearly that the ways of deal making, and the mechanism of checks and balances in this process, are very dynamic and reflect the changing dynamics of urban governance. This also means that public planners, very consciously, try to reposition themselves to safeguard the public interest.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPlanning and knowledge: How new forms of technocracy are shaping contemporary cities
EditorsMike Raco, Federico Savini
Place of PublicationBristol
PublisherPolicy Press
Pages47-57
ISBN (Electronic)9781447345251
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Plurality of expert knowledge: public planners’ experience with urban contractualism in Amsterdam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this