Abstract
The concept of planetary justice has received increasing attention within the field of earth systems governance. Although a significant epistemic shift, planetary justice discussions have primarily focused on western and (re)distributive notions of justice. By doing so, planetary justice is depriving current debates of crucial dimensions of what justice has meant for different communities and organisations. These trajectories spanning the realms of social activism, research, and institutional change have historically called for more than (re)distributional approaches to justice. We argue that recentring procedural, epistemic, and recognition-based notions of justice is critical in addressing the challenges of planetary justice in both research and practice of earth systems governance. Pluralising Planetary Justice (PPJ) requires a series of epistemic shifts in the way we research and practice the governance of environmental inequalities. These shifts demand attention to the links and gaps between justice movements and scholarship beyond the industrialised North. They also require scaling debates within climate justice and developmental ethics regarding peoples’ abilities to achieve well-being and the challenges of public deliberation across spatio-temporal scales. Finally, these shifts need to recognise long-lasting processes of epistemic colonialism and integrate intersectional, multispecies, intergenerational, and non-western notions of justice. We argue procedural, epistemic, and recognition-based justice are essential guiding principles and empirical standpoints to developing pluriversal and multiscale human-earth governance systems. Without appealing to procedural, recognition, and epistemic concerns, planetary justice cannot meaningfully engage with the necessary agents and trajectories or outline the normative ends to which it aims to advance in earth systems governance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 256-263 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Environmental Science & Policy |
| Volume | 128 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Rachel Carson Center for Environment & Society, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, and the Humanities & Arts Department at Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Rachel Carson Center for Environment & Society (RCC), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, and the Humanities & Arts Department at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The ideas in this paper were prompted while the authors were in residence at the RCC. We thank colleagues and fellows at the RCC for fostering an environment of collaboration and inspiring these discussions. We also thank the valuable contributions of the anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Planetary boundaries
- Environmental justice
- Global environmental governance
- Global South
- Anthropocene
- Science-policy interface
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pluralising planetary justice beyond the North-South divide: Recentring procedural, epistemic, and recognition-based justice in earth-systems governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver