Abstract
[Context and motivation] Identifying requirements
defects such as ambiguity and incompleteness is an important and challenging task in requirements engineering (RE). [Question/Problem] We investigate whether combining humans’ cognitive and analytical capabilities with automated reasoning is a viable method to support the identification of requirements quality defects.
[Principalideas/results] We propose a tool-supported approach for pinpointing terminological ambiguities between viewpoints as well as missing requirements. To do so, we blend natural language processing (conceptual model extraction and semantic similarity) with information visualization techniques that help interpret the type of defect.
[Contribution] Our approach is a step forward toward the identification of ambiguity and incompleteness in a set of requirements, still an open issue in RE. A quasi-experiment with students, aimed to assess whether our tool delivers higher accuracy than manual inspection, suggests a significantly higher
recall but does not reveal significant differences in precision.
defects such as ambiguity and incompleteness is an important and challenging task in requirements engineering (RE). [Question/Problem] We investigate whether combining humans’ cognitive and analytical capabilities with automated reasoning is a viable method to support the identification of requirements quality defects.
[Principalideas/results] We propose a tool-supported approach for pinpointing terminological ambiguities between viewpoints as well as missing requirements. To do so, we blend natural language processing (conceptual model extraction and semantic similarity) with information visualization techniques that help interpret the type of defect.
[Contribution] Our approach is a step forward toward the identification of ambiguity and incompleteness in a set of requirements, still an open issue in RE. A quasi-experiment with students, aimed to assess whether our tool delivers higher accuracy than manual inspection, suggests a significantly higher
recall but does not reveal significant differences in precision.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Requirements engineering: foundation for software quality |
| Subtitle of host publication | 24th international working conference, REFSQ 2018, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 19-22, 2018 : proceedings |
| Editors | Erik Kamsties, Jennifer Horkoff, Fabiano Dalpiaz |
| Pages | 119-135 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783319772431 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Publication series
| Name | Lecture notes in computer science |
|---|---|
| Volume | 10753 |
Keywords
- Natural language processing
- Requirements engineering
- Information visualization
- User stories
- Ambiguity
- European Union (EU)
- Horizon 2020
- Euratom
- Euratom research & training programme 2014-2018