TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Carboplatin and Topotecan Administered Intravenously Every 28 Days to Patients with Malignant Solid Tumors
AU - Boss, D.S.
AU - Siegel-Lakhai, W.S.
AU - van Egmond-Schoemaker, N.E.
AU - Pluim, D.
AU - Rosing, H.
AU - Huinink, W.W.T.
AU - Beijnen, J.H.
AU - Schellens, J.H.M.
N1 - ISI:000268908300029
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Purpose: Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of topotecan and carboplatin is synergistic. To evaluate the schedule dependency of this interaction, the following phase I trial was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of carboplatin and topotecan in patients with malignant solid tumors. Experimental Design: In part 1, patients received carboplatin on day 1 and topotecan on days 1, 2, and 3 (C -> T scheclule). In part 2, topotecan was administered on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by carboplatin on day 3 (T -> C schedule). Pharmacokinetics were determined in plasma and DNA topoisomerase I catalytic activity and Pt-DNA adducts in WBC and tumor tissue. Results: Forty-one patients were included. Dose-limiting toxicities during the C-T schedule were grade 4 thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia (MTD: carboplatin target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve, 4 min mg/mL; topotecan, 0.5 mg/m(2)/d). Dose-limiting toxicities during the T -> C schedule included grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 nausea and vomiting (MTD: carboplatin target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve, 6 min mg/mL; topotecan, 0.9 mg/m(2)/d). One complete response and five partial responses were observed. The clearance of and exposure to carboplatin and topotecan did not depend on the sequence of drug administration. No schedule-dependent effects were seen in Pt-DNA levels and DNA topoisomerase I catalytic activity in WBC and tumor tissue. However, myelotoxicity was clearly more evident in the C -> T scheclule. Conclusion: The T -> C schedule was better tolerated because both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were milder. Other pharmacodynamic factors than the ones investigated must explain the schedule-dependent differences in toxicities.
AB - Purpose: Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of topotecan and carboplatin is synergistic. To evaluate the schedule dependency of this interaction, the following phase I trial was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of carboplatin and topotecan in patients with malignant solid tumors. Experimental Design: In part 1, patients received carboplatin on day 1 and topotecan on days 1, 2, and 3 (C -> T scheclule). In part 2, topotecan was administered on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by carboplatin on day 3 (T -> C schedule). Pharmacokinetics were determined in plasma and DNA topoisomerase I catalytic activity and Pt-DNA adducts in WBC and tumor tissue. Results: Forty-one patients were included. Dose-limiting toxicities during the C-T schedule were grade 4 thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia (MTD: carboplatin target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve, 4 min mg/mL; topotecan, 0.5 mg/m(2)/d). Dose-limiting toxicities during the T -> C schedule included grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 nausea and vomiting (MTD: carboplatin target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve, 6 min mg/mL; topotecan, 0.9 mg/m(2)/d). One complete response and five partial responses were observed. The clearance of and exposure to carboplatin and topotecan did not depend on the sequence of drug administration. No schedule-dependent effects were seen in Pt-DNA levels and DNA topoisomerase I catalytic activity in WBC and tumor tissue. However, myelotoxicity was clearly more evident in the C -> T scheclule. Conclusion: The T -> C schedule was better tolerated because both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were milder. Other pharmacodynamic factors than the ones investigated must explain the schedule-dependent differences in toxicities.
M3 - Article
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 15
SP - 4475
EP - 4483
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 13
ER -