TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol Following Intranasal, Intrarectal, and Oral Administration in Healthy Dogs
AU - Polidoro, Dakir
AU - Temmerman, Robin
AU - Devreese, Mathias
AU - Charalambous, Marios
AU - Ham, Luc Van
AU - Cornelis, Ine
AU - Broeckx, Bart J G
AU - Mandigers, Paul J J
AU - Fischer, Andrea
AU - Storch, Jan
AU - Bhatti, Sofie F M
N1 - Funding Information:
CBD tablets (Cannamed® CBD tablets 100 mg, xMed 21 s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic), rectal suppositories (Cannef® suppositories 100 mg, CB21 Pharma s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic) and raw CBD product (for IN formulation) were kindly provided by CBDepot.eu (Teplice, Czech Republic).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Polidoro, Temmerman, Devreese, Charalambous, Ham, Cornelis, Broeckx, Mandigers, Fischer, Storch and Bhatti.
PY - 2022/6/7
Y1 - 2022/6/7
N2 - The therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychtropic component of the
Cannabis sativa plant, is substantiated more and more. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic behavior of CBD after a single dose
via intranasal (IN) and intrarectal (IR) administration in six healthy Beagle dogs age 3-8 years old, and compare to the oral administration route (PO). Standardized dosages applied for IN, IR and PO were 20, 100, and 100 mg, respectively. Each dog underwent the same protocol but received CBD through a different administration route. CBD plasma concentrations were determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry before and at fixed time points after administration. Non-compartmental analysis was performed on the plasma concentration-time profiles. Plasma CBD concentrations after IR administration were below the limit of quantification. The mean area under the curve (AUC) after IN and PO CBD administration was 61 and 1,376 ng/mL*h, respectively. The maximal plasma CBD concentration (C
max) after IN and PO CBD administration was 28 and 217 ng/mL reached after 0.5 and 3.5 h (T
max), respectively. Significant differences between IN and PO administration were found in the T
max (
p = 0.04). Higher AUC and C
max were achieved with 100 mg PO compared to 20 mg IN, but no significant differences were found when AUC (
p = 0.09) and C
max (
p = 0.44) were normalized to 1 mg dosages. IN administration of CBD resulted in faster absorption when compared to PO administration. However, PO remains the most favorable route for CBD delivery due to its more feasible administration. The IR administration route is not advised for clinical application.
AB - The therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychtropic component of the
Cannabis sativa plant, is substantiated more and more. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic behavior of CBD after a single dose
via intranasal (IN) and intrarectal (IR) administration in six healthy Beagle dogs age 3-8 years old, and compare to the oral administration route (PO). Standardized dosages applied for IN, IR and PO were 20, 100, and 100 mg, respectively. Each dog underwent the same protocol but received CBD through a different administration route. CBD plasma concentrations were determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry before and at fixed time points after administration. Non-compartmental analysis was performed on the plasma concentration-time profiles. Plasma CBD concentrations after IR administration were below the limit of quantification. The mean area under the curve (AUC) after IN and PO CBD administration was 61 and 1,376 ng/mL*h, respectively. The maximal plasma CBD concentration (C
max) after IN and PO CBD administration was 28 and 217 ng/mL reached after 0.5 and 3.5 h (T
max), respectively. Significant differences between IN and PO administration were found in the T
max (
p = 0.04). Higher AUC and C
max were achieved with 100 mg PO compared to 20 mg IN, but no significant differences were found when AUC (
p = 0.09) and C
max (
p = 0.44) were normalized to 1 mg dosages. IN administration of CBD resulted in faster absorption when compared to PO administration. However, PO remains the most favorable route for CBD delivery due to its more feasible administration. The IR administration route is not advised for clinical application.
KW - Canine
KW - cannabinoid
KW - Cannabis sativa
KW - phytocannabinoid
KW - tetrahydrocannabinol
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133377545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fvets.2022.899940
DO - 10.3389/fvets.2022.899940
M3 - Article
C2 - 35754531
SN - 2297-1769
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Frontiers in Veterinary Science
JF - Frontiers in Veterinary Science
M1 - 899940
ER -