Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 151-174 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | International Development Planning Review |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 17 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Liverpool University Press. All rights reserved.
Funding
As Stolarski and Acu\u00F1a (2015) explain, although the government\u2019s housing approach in the early 2000s was driven by financial and market criteria, efforts were made to strengthen alternative means of housing provision adjacent to the National Housing Law. For instance, between 2006 and 2012, Sociedad Hipotecaria Federal (SHF) developed two finance programmes catering to low-income families to address qualitative housing shortages. Likewise, the National Housing Commission (CONAVI), SHF, FONHAPO, the Treasury Ministry (SHCP), and the National Business Solidarity Fund (FONAES) developed the National Fund for Social Housing (FONGAVIT) to decrease the financial risk of providing affordable social credit for assisted self-help interventions. These social housing initiatives of the 2000s were inspired by ideas about assisted self-help housing of the 1970s related to Turner and the practices of social movements, which by this time had evolved and permeated, to some extent, in the institutional housing arena (Mier y Teran, 2015).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Treasury Ministry | |
CONAVI | |
Starkey Hearing Foundation | |
National Housing Commission | |
SHCP | |
FONAES | |
FONHAPO | |
National Fund for Social Housing | |
National Business Solidarity Fund | |
FONGAVIT |
Keywords
- Mexico
- assisted self-help housing
- governability
- housing policy
- peripheral urbanisation