TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C
T2 - a tale of turning around in no time?
AU - Kriegler, Elmar
AU - Luderer, Gunnar
AU - Bauer, Nico
AU - Baumstark, Lavinia
AU - Fujimori, Shinichiro
AU - Popp, Alexander
AU - Rogelj, Joeri
AU - Strefler, Jessica
AU - van Vuuren, Detlef P
N1 - © 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/5/13
Y1 - 2018/5/13
N2 - We explore the feasibility of limiting global warming to 1.5°C without overshoot and without the deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. For this purpose, we perform a sensitivity analysis of four generic emissions reduction measures to identify a lower bound on future CO2emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes. Final energy demand reductions and electrification of energy end uses as well as decarbonization of electricity and non-electric energy supply are all considered. We find the lower bound of cumulative fossil fuel and industry CO2emissions to be 570 GtCO2for the period 2016-2100, around 250 GtCO2lower than the lower end of available 1.5°C mitigation pathways generated with integrated assessment models. Estimates of 1.5°C-consistent CO2budgets are highly uncertain and range between 100 and 900 GtCO2from 2016 onwards. Based on our sensitivity analysis, limiting warming to 1.5°C will require CDR or terrestrial net carbon uptake if 1.5°C-consistent budgets are smaller than 650 GtCO2The earlier CDR is deployed, the more it neutralizes post-2020 emissions rather than producing net negative emissions. Nevertheless, if the 1.5°C budget is smaller than 550 GtCO2, temporary overshoot of the 1.5°C limit becomes unavoidable if CDR cannot be ramped up faster than to 4 GtCO2in 2040 and 10 GtCO2in 2050.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
AB - We explore the feasibility of limiting global warming to 1.5°C without overshoot and without the deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. For this purpose, we perform a sensitivity analysis of four generic emissions reduction measures to identify a lower bound on future CO2emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes. Final energy demand reductions and electrification of energy end uses as well as decarbonization of electricity and non-electric energy supply are all considered. We find the lower bound of cumulative fossil fuel and industry CO2emissions to be 570 GtCO2for the period 2016-2100, around 250 GtCO2lower than the lower end of available 1.5°C mitigation pathways generated with integrated assessment models. Estimates of 1.5°C-consistent CO2budgets are highly uncertain and range between 100 and 900 GtCO2from 2016 onwards. Based on our sensitivity analysis, limiting warming to 1.5°C will require CDR or terrestrial net carbon uptake if 1.5°C-consistent budgets are smaller than 650 GtCO2The earlier CDR is deployed, the more it neutralizes post-2020 emissions rather than producing net negative emissions. Nevertheless, if the 1.5°C budget is smaller than 550 GtCO2, temporary overshoot of the 1.5°C limit becomes unavoidable if CDR cannot be ramped up faster than to 4 GtCO2in 2040 and 10 GtCO2in 2050.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
KW - 1.5°C goal
KW - mitigation pathways
KW - Integrated assessment
KW - CO2 emissions
KW - carbon budget
KW - carbon dioxide removal
U2 - 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457
DO - 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457
M3 - Article
C2 - 29610367
SN - 0962-8428
VL - 376
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
IS - 2119
M1 - 20160457
ER -