Overruled! Implicit cues rather than an orthographic rule determine Dutch children's vowel spelling

Elise de Bree*, Jan Geelhoed, Madelon van den Boer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study addressed the question why vowel spelling acquisition is relatively difficult for young Dutch spellers. A spelling rule guides vowel spelling, but implicit cues could also play a role. We evaluated the role of phonology, morphology, and orthography. Grade 1 (N = 113) and 2 (N = 59) children were presented with dictations of real and pseudowords differing in the degree of consistency and familiarity. Correct scores of consistent vowel spelling in Grade 1 and 2 students were near ceiling, whereas those for inconsistent vowels were low, even in Grade 2 children, who have had explicit instruction of the spelling rule. Correct scores were affected by phonological and morphological consistency, and orthographic familiarity. Effects of these implicit cues were even more pronounced in Grade 2. Findings indicate that vowel length spelling is difficult to acquire because the explicit spelling rule is overruled by various sources of implicit information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-41
Number of pages12
JournalLearning and Instruction
Volume56
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Implicit cues
  • Instruction
  • Spelling
  • Spelling rule
  • Vowels

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Overruled! Implicit cues rather than an orthographic rule determine Dutch children's vowel spelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this