Optimising HIV care using information obtained from PROMs: protocol for an observational study

Kevin Moody, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Maarten Bedert, Jeannine F Nellen, Annouschka Weijsenfeld, Kim C E Sigaloff, Laura Laan, Claire Bruins, Hedy van Oers, Lotte Haverman, Suzanne E Geerlings, Marc Van der Valk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Successful antiviral therapy has transformed HIV infection into a chronic condition, where optimising quality of life (QoL) has become essential for successful lifelong treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can signal potential physical and mental health problems related to QoL. This study aims to determine whether PROMs in routine clinical care improve quality of care as experienced by people with HIV (PWH).

Methods and analysis We report the protocol of a multicentre longitudinal cohort studying PWH at Amsterdam University Medical Centres in the Netherlands. PROMs are offered annually to patients via the patient portal of the electronic health record. Domains include anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, social isolation, physical functioning, stigma, post-traumatic stress disorder, adherence, drug and alcohol use and screening questions for sexual health and issues related to finances, housing and migration status. Our intervention comprises (1) patients’ completion of PROMs, (2) discussion of PROMs scores during annual consultations and (3) documentation of follow-up actions in an individualised care plan, if indicated. The primary endpoint will be patient-experienced quality of care, measured by the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Short Form (PACIC-S). Patients will provide measurements at baseline, year 1 and year 2. We will explore change over time in PACIC-S and PROMs scores and examine the sociodemographical and HIV-specific characteristics of subgroups of patients who participated in all or only part of the intervention to ascertain whether benefit has been achieved from our intervention in all subgroups.

Ethics and dissemination Patients provide consent for the analysis of data collected as part of routine clinical care to the AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands study (ATHENA) cohort through mechanisms described in Boender et al. Additional ethical approval for the analysis of these data is not required under the ATHENA cohort protocol. The results will be presented at national and international academic meetings and submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising HIV care using information obtained from PROMs: protocol for an observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this