TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal localized observationDsiscfuossrionas dvancing beyond the ENSO predictability barrier
AU - Kramer, W.
AU - Dijkstra, H.A.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The existing 20-member ensemble of 50 yr
ECHAM5/MPI-OM simulations provides a reasonably realistic
Monte Carlo sample of the El Ni˜no–Southern Oscillation
(ENSO). Localized observations of sea surface temperature
(SST), zonal wind speed and thermocline depth are assimilated
in the ensemble using sequential importance sampling
to adjust the weight of ensemble members. We determine
optimal observation locations, for which assimilation
yields the minimal ensemble spread. Efficient observation
locations for SST lie in the ENSO pattern, with the optimum
located in the eastern and western Pacific for minimizing
uncertainty in the NINO3 and NINO4 index, respectively.
After the assimilation of the observations, we investigate
how the weighted ensemble performs as a nine-month
probabilistic forecast of the ENSO. Here, we focus on the
spring predictability barrier with observation in the January–
March (March–May) period and assess the remaining predictive
power in June (August) for NINO3 (NINO4). For the
ECHAM5/MPI-OM ensemble, this yields that SST observations
around 110 W and 140 W provide the best predictive
skill for the NINO3 and NINO4 index, respectively. Forecasts
can be improved by additionally measuring the thermocline
depth at 150 W.
AB - The existing 20-member ensemble of 50 yr
ECHAM5/MPI-OM simulations provides a reasonably realistic
Monte Carlo sample of the El Ni˜no–Southern Oscillation
(ENSO). Localized observations of sea surface temperature
(SST), zonal wind speed and thermocline depth are assimilated
in the ensemble using sequential importance sampling
to adjust the weight of ensemble members. We determine
optimal observation locations, for which assimilation
yields the minimal ensemble spread. Efficient observation
locations for SST lie in the ENSO pattern, with the optimum
located in the eastern and western Pacific for minimizing
uncertainty in the NINO3 and NINO4 index, respectively.
After the assimilation of the observations, we investigate
how the weighted ensemble performs as a nine-month
probabilistic forecast of the ENSO. Here, we focus on the
spring predictability barrier with observation in the January–
March (March–May) period and assess the remaining predictive
power in June (August) for NINO3 (NINO4). For the
ECHAM5/MPI-OM ensemble, this yields that SST observations
around 110 W and 140 W provide the best predictive
skill for the NINO3 and NINO4 index, respectively. Forecasts
can be improved by additionally measuring the thermocline
depth at 150 W.
U2 - 10.5194/npg-20-221-2013
DO - 10.5194/npg-20-221-2013
M3 - Article
SN - 1023-5809
VL - 20
SP - 221
EP - 230
JO - Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
JF - Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
ER -