TY - JOUR
T1 - Opening up the transition arena
T2 - An analysis of (dis)empowerment of civil society actors in transition management in cities
AU - Hölscher, K.
AU - Wittmayer, J.M.
AU - Avelino, F.
AU - Giezen, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted as part of the EU-Interreg MUSIC-project (www.themusicproject.eu) and the EU FP7 project IMPRESSIONS (www.impressions-project.eu). The authors would like to thank the interviewees from the case studies, colleagues at DRIFT who gave feedback during an internal presentation, and the participants of the NWO-JSPS seminar ?Studying sustainability transitions in welfare states? in Rotterdam, September 10?13, 2014 who reacted on a presentation of an earlier version.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - This article shows opportunities and intricacies of transition management as a facilitated empowerment process that seeks to empower ‘frontrunners’ to (re-)define and take up roles in contributing to sustainability transitions. In the context of ‘retreating’ welfare states there is an increasing focus on ‘empowering’ civil society actors to take over service provisions and addressing sustainability challenges. This reorganisation of governments' responsibilities and tasks vis-à-vis civil society and businesses raises questions about the (uneven) (re-)distribution of responsibilities between different (groups of) actors. We first draw on insights from empowerment literature to elucidate the conceptual understanding of (dis)empowerment in transition management, focusing on the transition arena as the most prominent tool of the approach. We emphasise that transition management also harbours the risk of disempowerment, i.e. creating/exacerbating a sense of powerlessness and thus decreasing the ability of actors to take up roles in sustainability transitions. We apply the framework to analyse (dis)empowerment in transition management processes in four North-Western European ‘welfare cities’: Aberdeen (UK), Ghent (BEL), Ludwigsburg (GER), and Montreuil (FR). These processes brought together civil society actors as frontrunners in the transition arena that was facilitated by local policy officers in transition teams. Transition management appears as a fruitful intervention to boost new social relations, (re-)definitions of roles and intrinsic motivations of actors to influence sustainability transitions, yet the implementation of the empowering process principles requires new skills and mind-sets. While experimental process methodologies like transition management seem to offer new ways forward for pro-actively engaging with the intentional and unintentional changes of actor roles in the context of restructuring welfare states, how and to what extent transition management acts as a (dis)empowerment process shows that changes of roles and responsibilities need to be mediated through co-creation processes in which diverse actors jointly reflect on and discuss their roles in contributing to societal welfare.
AB - This article shows opportunities and intricacies of transition management as a facilitated empowerment process that seeks to empower ‘frontrunners’ to (re-)define and take up roles in contributing to sustainability transitions. In the context of ‘retreating’ welfare states there is an increasing focus on ‘empowering’ civil society actors to take over service provisions and addressing sustainability challenges. This reorganisation of governments' responsibilities and tasks vis-à-vis civil society and businesses raises questions about the (uneven) (re-)distribution of responsibilities between different (groups of) actors. We first draw on insights from empowerment literature to elucidate the conceptual understanding of (dis)empowerment in transition management, focusing on the transition arena as the most prominent tool of the approach. We emphasise that transition management also harbours the risk of disempowerment, i.e. creating/exacerbating a sense of powerlessness and thus decreasing the ability of actors to take up roles in sustainability transitions. We apply the framework to analyse (dis)empowerment in transition management processes in four North-Western European ‘welfare cities’: Aberdeen (UK), Ghent (BEL), Ludwigsburg (GER), and Montreuil (FR). These processes brought together civil society actors as frontrunners in the transition arena that was facilitated by local policy officers in transition teams. Transition management appears as a fruitful intervention to boost new social relations, (re-)definitions of roles and intrinsic motivations of actors to influence sustainability transitions, yet the implementation of the empowering process principles requires new skills and mind-sets. While experimental process methodologies like transition management seem to offer new ways forward for pro-actively engaging with the intentional and unintentional changes of actor roles in the context of restructuring welfare states, how and to what extent transition management acts as a (dis)empowerment process shows that changes of roles and responsibilities need to be mediated through co-creation processes in which diverse actors jointly reflect on and discuss their roles in contributing to societal welfare.
KW - Empowerment
KW - Governance
KW - Transition management
KW - Urban sustainability transitions
KW - Welfare states
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035323980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85035323980
SN - 0040-1625
VL - 145
SP - 176
EP - 185
JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
ER -