Oocyst shedding patterns of Eimeria species and their association with management and performance at ten rose veal starter farms in the Netherlands.

Angelique Rijpert-Duvivier*, Niels Geurts, Frederic Vangroenweghe, Liesbeth Allais, Deborah van Doorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Coccidiosis at rose veal starter farms is often diagnosed however, this was the first study performed considering this topic on this type of rearing unit. The objective of this study was to identify Eimeria species faecal shedding patterns at ten Dutch rose veal starter farms during rearing. Further objectives were to investigate associations with (gut) health, production and management decisions. Faecal samples from twelve randomly selected calves per farm were collected weekly during 9 consecutive weeks. Thereafter samples were pooled in a predetermined composition of six. These calves were clinically evaluated every sample visit and weighed at the first and last visit. Laboratory tests included a flotation test of the samples. If this yielded Eimeria oocysts, both oocysts per gram feces (OPG) and species differentiation were established using a modified McMaster method. Management parameters and technical herd results were identified after finalizing the study period using a questionnaire. Studied patterns in oocyst shedding included the pool's cumulated OPG, maximum OPG level and the number of sample days (SD) that OPG exceeded a confirmed level. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate analysis. Associated (p < 0.10) OPG patterns considering rumen fill, faecal consistency and average daily weight gain (ADG) were tested using a model with herd included as random effect. Results: on all ten farms E. alabamensis, E.bovis and E. zuernii besides non-pathogenic species were identified, often as mixed infections. Peak OPG occurred predominately at SD 21 and 28 (E. alabamensis and E. bovis), and at SD 42 (E. zuernii). In 16 pools, OPG levels ≥500 for E. bovis or E. zuernii, were found. Significant correlation (p < 0.0001) showed between the log10 OPG of pathogenic Eimeria and of all Eimeria species. Multivariate analysis showed significant correlation between cumulative faecal consistency scores and cumulative log10 OPG of pathogenic Eimeria species (β = 0.16; p = 0.008). Pools exceeding 750 OPG for E. bovis showed 93 g lower ADG and pools experiencing ≥2 SD with >1000 OPG for E. alabamensis 141 g lower ADG. From the questionnaire we identified lower cumulated OPG of all Eimeria species except for E. bovis at farms where the units were cleaned before arrival of the calves. Conclusion: As a rule, on Dutch rose veal starter farms, mixed Eimeria infections occur, but shedding patterns differ between farms. Clinical and growth performance is related to OPG patterns found. Cleaning units before arrival of calves lowers oocyst shedding during the rearing period.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100570
Pages (from-to)1-11
JournalVeterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit. The study reported here was funded by Elanco Benelux. Auditor A.C.M. Rijpert-Duvivier is a current employee of Elanco. sectors.

Funding Information:
We acknowledge the enthusiastic execution of the fieldwork by Evert van de Kieft veterinary student at the University of Utrecht, and Lieve Goossens for her help with statistical analysis, Matthew Colston for the English review and of course the farm owners and herd managers involved.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Keywords

  • Calves
  • Coccidiosis
  • Eimeria
  • OPG
  • Oocysts
  • Pooled faecal samples
  • Rose veal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oocyst shedding patterns of Eimeria species and their association with management and performance at ten rose veal starter farms in the Netherlands.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this