Only when the societal impact is high? A panel study of the relationship between public service motivation and perceived performance

N.M. van Loon, Anne Mette Kjeldsen, Lotte Andersen, W.V. Vandenabeele, P.L.M. Leisink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Many studies find positive associations between public service motivation (PSM) and performance, but much of this literature is based on cross-sectional data prone to endogeneity and common method bias. Moreover, we know little about potential moderators. In this study, we test the moderating role of societal impact potential (SIP)—the degree to which the job is perceived to provide opportunities to contribute to society. We use cross-sectional data from 13,967 employees in 2010 and 2012 aggregated to construct longitudinal data for 42 organizations. As expected, the association between PSM and individual perceived performance is positive when SIP is high. However, when SIP is low, PSM is only weakly or not at all related to performance. This is an important insight for organizations that try to enhance performance through PSM. Our findings suggest that this can only be done when the employees think that their jobs allow them to contribute to society.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date1 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Only when the societal impact is high? A panel study of the relationship between public service motivation and perceived performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this