One HRM Fits All? A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of HRM Practices in the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector

R. Blom*, P. M. Kruyen, Beatrice I.J.M. Van der Heijden, Sandra Van Thiel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For a long time, public and semipublic organizations have borrowed Human Resource Management (HRM) practices from the private sector to enhance employee performance. Numerous scholars argue, however, that business-like practices are less effective outside the private sector context because of sector-specific conditions. Based on the ability–motivation–opportunity model, we performed a three-level meta-analysis to investigate differences in effects of HRM practices on individual performance across sectors. Our study shows that significant differences exist between sectors, but the expectation that the effects of HRM practices are largest in the private sector and smallest in the public sector is not supported. More specifically, the differences between the public, semipublic, and private sector are not straightforward. In this respect, we encourage future scholars to further examine these differences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-35
JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • HRM practices
  • employee performance
  • meta-analysis
  • cross-sectoral comparison
  • public management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One HRM Fits All? A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of HRM Practices in the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this