On the voluntariness of public health apps: a European case study on digital contact tracing

Bart A. Kamphorst*, Marcel F. Verweij, Josephine A.W. van Zeben

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

As evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a growing reliance on smartphone apps such as digital contact tracing apps and vaccination passports to respond to and mitigate public health threats. In light of the European Commission's guidance, Member States typically offer such apps on a voluntary, ‘opt-in’ basis. In this paper, we question the extent to which the individual choice to use these apps–and similar future technologies–is indeed a voluntary one. By explicating ethical and legal considerations governing the choice situations surrounding the use of smartphone apps, specifically those related to the negative consequences that declining the use of these apps may have (e.g. loss of opportunities, social exclusion, stigma), we argue that the projected downsides of refusal may in effect limit the liberty to decline for certain subpopulations. To mitigate these concerns, we recommend three categories of approaches that may be employed by governments to safeguard voluntariness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107 -123
JournalLaw, Innovation and Technology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • digital contact tracing
  • liberty
  • smartphone apps
  • stigmatisation
  • Voluntariness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the voluntariness of public health apps: a European case study on digital contact tracing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this