TY - JOUR
T1 - On the voluntariness of public health apps
T2 - a European case study on digital contact tracing
AU - Kamphorst, Bart A.
AU - Verweij, Marcel F.
AU - van Zeben, Josephine A.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - As evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a growing reliance on smartphone apps such as digital contact tracing apps and vaccination passports to respond to and mitigate public health threats. In light of the European Commission's guidance, Member States typically offer such apps on a voluntary, ‘opt-in’ basis. In this paper, we question the extent to which the individual choice to use these apps–and similar future technologies–is indeed a voluntary one. By explicating ethical and legal considerations governing the choice situations surrounding the use of smartphone apps, specifically those related to the negative consequences that declining the use of these apps may have (e.g. loss of opportunities, social exclusion, stigma), we argue that the projected downsides of refusal may in effect limit the liberty to decline for certain subpopulations. To mitigate these concerns, we recommend three categories of approaches that may be employed by governments to safeguard voluntariness.
AB - As evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a growing reliance on smartphone apps such as digital contact tracing apps and vaccination passports to respond to and mitigate public health threats. In light of the European Commission's guidance, Member States typically offer such apps on a voluntary, ‘opt-in’ basis. In this paper, we question the extent to which the individual choice to use these apps–and similar future technologies–is indeed a voluntary one. By explicating ethical and legal considerations governing the choice situations surrounding the use of smartphone apps, specifically those related to the negative consequences that declining the use of these apps may have (e.g. loss of opportunities, social exclusion, stigma), we argue that the projected downsides of refusal may in effect limit the liberty to decline for certain subpopulations. To mitigate these concerns, we recommend three categories of approaches that may be employed by governments to safeguard voluntariness.
KW - digital contact tracing
KW - liberty
KW - smartphone apps
KW - stigmatisation
KW - Voluntariness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149597077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17579961.2023.2184137
DO - 10.1080/17579961.2023.2184137
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149597077
SN - 1757-9961
VL - 15
SP - 107
EP - 123
JO - Law, Innovation and Technology
JF - Law, Innovation and Technology
IS - 1
ER -