Abstract
Scoring, the process of selecting the biologically relevant
solution from a pool of generated conformations, is one of
the major challenges in the field of biomolecular docking. A
prominent way to cope with this challenge is to incorporate
information-based terms into the scoring function. Within this
context, low-resolution shape data obtained from either ionmobility
mass spectrometry (IM-MS) or SAXS experiments
have been integrated into the conventional scoring function of
the information-driven docking program HADDOCK. Here,
the strengths and weaknesses of IM-MS-based and SAXSbased
scoring, either in isolation or in combination with the
HADDOCK score, are systematically assessed. The results of
an analysis of a large docking decoy set composed of dimers
generated by running HADDOCK in ab initio mode reveal
that the content of the IM-MS data is of too low resolution for
selecting correct models, while scoring with SAXS data leads
to a significant improvement in performance. However, the
effectiveness of SAXS scoring depends on the shape and the
arrangement of the complex, with prolate and oblate systems
showing the best performance. It is observed that the highest
accuracy is achieved when SAXS scoring is combined with the
energy-based HADDOCK score.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 683-694 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Acta crystallographica. Section D, biological crystallography |
Volume | 69 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- small-angle X-ray scattering
- collision cross-section
- ion-mobility mass spectrometry
- HADDOCK
- low resolution
- hybrid methods